<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is possible to identify Tibicen just after they have molted</title>
	<link>http://www.cicadamania.com/cicadas/2006/09/05/it-is-possible-to-identify-tibicen-just-after-they-have-molted/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to cicadas, the most amazing insects in the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David E</title>
		<link>http://www.cicadamania.com/cicadas/2006/09/05/it-is-possible-to-identify-tibicen-just-after-they-have-molted/#comment-3676</link>
		<dc:creator>David E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cicadamania.com/cicadas/2006/09/05/it-is-possible-to-identify-tibicen-just-after-they-have-molted/#comment-3676</guid>
		<description>Awesome stuff Paul- keep up the excellent sleuthing and great photo posts. It would appear that the microscopic taxonomists will have to assist you with classification, since straight morphotaxonomy doesn't give you a quick "rule of thumb" for an eyeball differentiation for your T.davisi and T.canicularis. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome stuff Paul- keep up the excellent sleuthing and great photo posts. It would appear that the microscopic taxonomists will have to assist you with classification, since straight morphotaxonomy doesn&#8217;t give you a quick &#8220;rule of thumb&#8221; for an eyeball differentiation for your T.davisi and T.canicularis. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
